Men and Women Repeatedly Infected WithChlamydia trachomatisHave a Lower Urogenital Bacterial Load
SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES
Authors: Wijers, Julien N. A. P.; van Liere, Genevieve A. F. S.; Dukers-Muijrers, Nicole H. T. M.; Wolffs, Petra F. G.; Hoebe, Christian J. P. A.
Abstract
We assessed whether patients repeatedly infected withChlamydia trachomatis(CT) have a lower urogenital or anorectal CT load. A CT-positive retest was independently associated with higher vaginal and higher urine Cq values (P<0.01). Partial immunity could play a role in repeat urogenital infections, potentially not in anorectal infections.
Developing target product profiles forNeisseria gonorrhoeaediagnostics in the context of antimicrobial resistance: An expert consensus
PLOS ONE
Authors: Ferreyra, Cecilia; Osborn, Jennifer; Moussy, Francis; Alirol, Emilie; Lahra, Monica; Whiley, David; Shafer, William; Unemo, Magnus; Klausner, Jeffrey; Kelly Cirino, Cassandra; Wi, Teodora
Abstract
Background There is a need for a rapid diagnostic point of care test to detectNeisseria gonorrhoeae(NG) infection to prevent incorrect, lack or excess of treatment resulting from current syndromic management in low-resource settings. An assay to identify NG antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is also highly desirable to facilitate antibiotic stewardship. Here we describe the development of two target product profiles (TPPs): one for a test for etiological diagnosis of NG andChlamydia trachomatis(CT) (TPP1) and one for the detection of NG AMR/susceptibility (TPP2). Methods Draft TPPs were initially developed based on a landscape analysis of existing diagnostics and expert input. TPPs were refined via an online Delphi survey with two rounds of input from 68 respondents. TPP characteristics on which Results The need for a test to identify NG in patients with urethral or vaginal discharge was identified as a minimal requirement of TPP1, with a test that can diagnose NG in asymptomatic patients as the optimal requirement. A sensitivity of 80% was considered acceptable, either in context of syndromic management or screening high-risk populations. For TPP2, the agreed minimal requirement was for a test to be used at level 2 healthcare facilities and above, with an optimal requirement of level 1 or above. A lateral flow format was preferred for TPP1, while it was considered likely that TPP2 would require a molecular format. A total of 31 test characteristics were included in TPP1 and 27 in TPP2. Conclusions Following the working group revisions, TPPs were posted online for public feedback for two months, and are now finalized. The final TPPs are currently guiding the development of new diagnostics that meet the defined characteristics to reach the market within two years.