Anti-KRT6A monoclonal antibody, clone C11 [FITC]

Extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma (EMC) is a rare mesenchymal neoplasm, rarely reported in the genitourinary tract with only 5 cases reported in the vulva. We investigated 2 cases of vulvar sarcomas whose morphologic appearance and immunohistochemical profiles were consistent with EMC using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, and a whole genome expression array. FISH and reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction assays showed no EWSR1 and NR4A3 loci rearrangements. Microarray-based analysis also revealed no changes in NR4A3 and EWSR1 gene transcription levels. Microarray data showed a significant downregulation of the muscle-related genes (eg, myosin heavy chain family, actins, myoglobin, desmin, creatine kinase, troponins) and cytokeratins (KRT6A, 6B, 13, 14, and 78), upregulation of several neuron-specific genes [neural cell adhesion molecule 1 (NCAM-1/CD56), neurofilament (NEFH)], along with some well-characterized tumor biomarkers [carbonic anhydrase IX (CA-9), topoisomerase II alpha (TOP2A), matrix metalloproteinases (MMP-7, MMP-9), CDKN2 gene (p16-INK4a), checkpoint homolog 2 (CHEK2)]. Notably, both tumors showed upregulation of the pleomorphic adenoma gene 1 (PLAG1), and in 1 case PLAG1 gene rearrangement was detected by break-apart FISH. Some vulvar tumors with morphologic and immunohistochemical characteristics of EMC may represent a molecular genetic entity separate from EMCs arising in other locations. PLAG1 gene activation appears to be involved in the development of these neoplasms.

Background: Compelling evidence shows that progestins regulate breast cancer growth. Using preclinical models, we demonstrated that antiprogestins are inhibitory when the level of progesterone receptor isoform A (PR-A) is higher than that of isoform B (PR-B) and that they might stimulate growth when PR-B is predominant. The aims of this study were to investigate ex vivo responses to mifepristone (MFP) in breast carcinomas with different PR isoform ratios and to examine their clinical and molecular characteristics. Methods: We performed human breast cancer tissue culture assays (n=36) to evaluate the effect of MFP on cell proliferation. PR isoform expression was determined by immunoblotting (n=282). Tumors were categorized as PRA-H (PR-A/PR-B >= 1.2) or PRB-H (PR-A/PR-B <= 0.83). RNA was extracted for Ribo-Zero-Seq sequencing to evaluate differentially expressed genes. Subtypes and risk scores were predicted using the PAM50 gene set, the data analyzed using The Cancer Genome Atlas RNA-seq gene analysis and other publicly available gene expression data. Tissue microarrays were performed using paraffin-embedded tissues (PRA-H n=53, PRB-H n=24), and protein expression analyzed by immunohistochemistry. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: One hundred sixteen out of 222 (52.3%) PR+ tumors were PRA-H, and 64 (28.8%) PRB-H. Cell proliferation was inhibited by MFP in 19 of 19 tissue cultures from PRA-H tumors. A total of 139 transcripts related to proliferative pathways were differentially expressed in nine PRA-H and seven PRB-H tumors. PRB-H and PRA-H tumors were either luminal B or A phenotypes, respectively (P=.03). PRB-H cases were associated with shorter relapse-free survival (hazard ratio [HR]=2.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.71 to 6.20, P=.02) and distant metastasis-free survival (HR=4.17, 95% CI=2.18 to 7.97, P<.001). PRB-H tumors showed increased tumor size (P<.001), Ki-67 levels (P<.001), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression (P=.04), high grades (P=.03), and decreased total PR (P=.004) compared with PRA-H tumors. MUC-2 (P<.001) and KRT6A (P=.02) were also overexpressed in PRB-H tumors. Conclusion: The PRA/PRB ratio is a prognostic and predictive factor for antiprogestin responsiveness in breast cancer.