A phase I trial combining high-dose Y-90-labeled humanized anti-CEA monoclonal antibody with doxorubicin and peripheral blood stem cell rescue in advanced medullary thyroid cancer
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Authors: Sharkey, RM; Hajjar, G; Yeldell, D; Brenner, A; Burton, J; Rubin, A; Goldenberg, DM
Abstract
This trial determined the pharmacokinetics, dosimetry, and dose-limiting toxicity of Y-90-hMN-14 IgG (humanized anticarcinoembryonic antigen [CEA, or CEACAM5] monoclonal antibody; labetuzumab), combined with doxorubicin and peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) support in advanced medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) patients. Methods: Fifteen patients received an infusion of In-111-hMN-14 IgG. One to 2 wk later, 14 patients received 90Y-hMN-14 IgG, starting at 740 MBq/m(2), followed 24 h later with a fixed intravenous bolus dose of doxorubicin (60 Mg/m(2)). Preharvested PBSCs were reinfused when the Y-90 activity in the body was <= 111 MBq/m(2). Results: The mean red marrow dose estimated for the 90Y-hMN-14 IgG was 1.65 +/- 0.59 mGy/MBq (n = 11), with normal organs ranging from similar to 2.3 to 4.4 mGy/MBq. Eighty percent of all known lesions (125/156), including 78 of 79 bone and 16 putatively occult lesions, were targeted. The average radiation dose to the tumor was 15.1 +/- 10.8 mGy/ MBq (55.8 39.8 cGy/mCi) Y-90-hMN-4 IgG (n = 29 tumors in 8 patients), with a majority of the lesions receiving > 2,000 cGy at an administered dose of <= 1,480 MBq/m(2). The average tumor-to-red marrow, tumor-to-liver, tumor-to-lungs, and tumor-to-kidneys ratios were 15.0 +/- 11.0, 5.1 +/- 3.6, 6.9 +/- 6.1 and 9.0 +/- 8.7, respectively. Cardiopulmonary toxicity was dose limiting at 1,850 MBq/m(2). Minor responses were noted in 2 patients and 1 patient had a partial response (68% reduction in local and hepatic metastatic disease). Conclusion: This treatment combination was well tolerated with complete recovery of blood counts and reversible nonhematologic toxicities at the maximum tolerated dose of 1,480 MBq/m(2). Evidence of antitumor response in these patients with advanced cancer was modest, but encouraging; this type of treatment may be more successful if applied to more limited, earlier-stage disease.
Seriate cytology vs molecular analysis of peritoneal washing to improve gastric cancer cells detection
DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY
Authors: Taffon, Chiara; Giovannoni, Isabella; Mozetic, Pamela; Capolupo, Gabriella Teresa; La Vaccara, Vincenzo; Cinque, Cristina; Caricato, Chiara; Rainer, Alberto; Zelano, Giovanni; Crescenzi, Anna
Abstract
Background Intraperitoneal malignant cells detection in patients with gastric cancer is associated with a significant decrease in overall survival. The overall accuracy of cytological examination of peritoneal lavages, however, is quite low, and intraperitoneal recurrence has been observed even in patients with negative cytology. Immunocytochemistry and molecular techniques have been investigated to improve high-risk patients' identification with variable results. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of different laboratory methods applied to peritoneal washing, to improve the cytological identification of malignant cells. Methods We prospectively evaluated 21 patients who underwent surgery and peritoneal lavage for gastric cancer. Among them, 18 had negative cytology and three were positive for malignant cells. For each patient, immunohistochemistry with BerEP4 antibody was performed on seriate sections of cellblock preparation at different levels, using the method reported for sentinel nodes in other types of cancer. Paired frozen quotes of washing fluids were evaluated by qRT-PCR with primer for mRNA of Ceacam5. Results In 4 of 18 patients with previous negative routine cytology, isolated neoplastic cells in seriate sections of the cellblock inclusion have been found. Results showed to be coherent with molecular analysis for CEA mRNA. Conclusion The sensitivity and specificity of peritoneal washing analyses should be notably improved by immunohistochemistry applied to multilevel cellblock sectioning. The method is less expensive and more widely applicable than molecular analysis, in each laboratory setting. This approach allows detection of minimum peritoneal seeding in patients with gastric cancer.