Anti-ANPEP monoclonal antibody, clone WM15 [R-PE]

Background: Chemotherapy options in advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) remain limited. Here we evaluated the peptide-based alkylating agent melphalan-flufenamide (mel-flufen) for UC. Methods: UC cell lines J82; RT4, TCCsup and 5637 were treated with mel-flufen, alone or combined with cisplatin, gemcitabine, dasatinib or bestatin. Cell viability (MTT assay), intracellular drug accumulation (liquid chromatography) apoptosis induction (apoptotic cell nuclei morphology, western blot analysis of PARP-1/caspase-9 cleavage and Bak/Bax activation) were evaluated. Kinome alterations were characterized by PathScan array and phospho-Src validated by western blotting. Aminopeptidase N (ANPEP) expression was evaluated in UC clinical specimens in relation to patient outcome. Results: In J82, RT4, TCCsup and 5637 UC cells, mel-flufen amplified the intracellular loading of melphalan in part via aminopeptidase N (ANPEP), resulting in increased cytotoxicity compared to melphalan alone. Mel-flufen induced apoptosis seen as activation of Bak/Bax, cleavage of caspase-9/PARP-1 and induction of apoptotic cell nuclei morphology. Combining mel-flufen with cisplatin or gemcitabine in J82 cells resulted in additive cytotoxic effects and for gemcitabine also increased apoptosis induction. Profiling of melflufen-induced kinome alterations in J82 cells revealed that mel-flufen alone did not inhibit Src phosphorylation. Accordingly, the Src inhibitor dasatinib sensitized for melflufen cytotoxicity. Immunohistochemical analysis of the putative mel-flufen biomarker ANPEP demonstrated prominent expression levels in tumours from 82 of 83 cystectomy patients. Significantly longer median overall survival was found in patients with high ANPEP expression (P = 0.02). Conclusion: Mel-flufen alone or in combination with cisplatin, gemcitabine or Src inhibition holds promise as a novel treatment for UC. (C) 2016 Federation of European Biochemical Societies. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Background and Aims: As ulcerative colitis [UC]-associated colorectal cancer [CRC] and sporadic CRC differ in presentation and molecular features, we sought to evaluate differences in the impact of DNA methylation on gene expression. Methods: DNA methylation was assessed in 11 UC-CRCs and adjacent tissue and 11 sporadic CRCs and adjacent tissue, using Illumina arrays. RNA sequencing was performed on 10 UC-CRCs and adjacent tissue and eight sporadic CRCs and adjacent tissues. Differences in DNA methylation and transcript expression, as well as their correlation in the same tissues, were assessed. Immunohistochemistry was performed for three proteins, ANPEP, FAM92A1, and STK31, all of which exhibited an inverse correlation between DNA methylation and transcript expression in UC. Results: Thirty three loci demonstrated differences in DNA methylation between UC-CRC and adjacent tissue. In contrast, there were 4204 differentially methylated loci between sporadic colon cancer and adjacent tissue. Eight hundred eighty six genes as well as 10 long non-coding RNAs [lncRNA] were differentially expressed between UC-CRC and adjacent tissues. Although there were no differentially methylated loci between UC and sporadic CRC, 997 genes and 38 lncRNAs were differentially expressed between UC-CRC and sporadic CRC. In UC, 18 genes demonstrated a negative correlation between DNA methylation and transcript expression. Evaluation of protein expression related to three genes, ANPEP, FAM92A1, and STK31, confirmed down-regulation of ANPEP and up-regulation of STK31 in UC-CRC. Conclusions: Regulation of transcript expression by DNA methylation involves genes key to colon carcinogenesis and may account for differences in presentation and outcomes between inflammatory bowel disease and sporadic colon cancer.