Anti-HBV Surface Antigen Monoclonal antibody, Clone C8

Purpose of review To examine issues specific to HIV--HBV co-infection that are relevant to the search for and achieving hepatitis B cure in this the setting Recent findings In HIV--HBV co-infection, high rates of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss early after initiation of HBV-active antiretroviral therapy (ART) have previously been reported. Between 2012 and 2016, HBsAg loss from 2.8 to 23% was reported in numerous studies, including those already on suppressive HBV-active ART. Data published in 2018-2019 show that these rates have remained fairly stable (3.0-13.9%). However, it appears that higher HBsAg loss on starting HBV-active ART in co-infection falls within a few years to levels similar to that observed in long-term treated HBV mono-infection. Immune reconstitution and CD4+ T-cell recovery are likely to play a role in high HBsAg loss rates seen in early treated co-infection, although the mechanisms driving this are yet to be fully elucidated. High rates of HBsAg loss early after HBV-active ART initiation is unique to HIV--HBV co-infection, making it the ideal setting to investigate underlying mechanisms of HBV loss and develop new HBV cure strategies. This phenomenon could be used to enhance HBsAg loss with new therapeutic approaches currently being investigated; however, this is obstructed by excluding co-infection from such studies.

Background Post-transfusion hepatitis B virus (PTHB) infection is still a public health problem in the world. In many developed countries, nucleic acid testing (NAT) for detection of Hepatitis B Virus (HBV)-DNA has been implemented to enhance blood donation safety. In Libya, however, the testing for HBV infection is limited to the detection of HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) only. Objectives To determine the frequency of anti-Hepatitis B core antibody (HBc) and HBV-DNA in HBsAg-negative, anti-HBc-positive blood donors in the main Central Blood Bank Units (CBBUs) in eastern Libya. Methods One thousand blood samples were obtained from healthy blood donors at the five main CBBUs in eastern Libya. The samples were screened for HBsAg and anti-HBc. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was carried out to detect HBV-DNA in all anti-HBc-positive samples. Results A total of 94 (9.4%) donors were positive for anti-HBc. Of the 94 anti-HBc-positive samples, 9 samples (9.5%) tested positive for HBV-DNA by real-time PCR. Conclusion The rate of anti-HBc among blood donors in this study (9.4%) was similar to that reported from other regions in the country. In the absence of advanced tests for the detection of HBV infection in blood donors, such as NAT, anti-HBc should be routinely tested for, at least for first-time donors.