Syrian Hamster Anti-Mouse Podoplanin (gp38) Monoclonal antibody, clone 8.1.1 Functional Grade

Tissues of the central nervous system (CNS), including the optic nerve (ON), are considered a-lymphatic. However, lymphatic structures have been described in the dura mater of human ON sheaths. Since it is known that lymphatic markers are also expressed by single non-lymphatic cells, these results need confirmation ac-cording to the consensus statement for the use of lymphatic markers in ophthalmologic research. The aim of this study was to screen for the presence of lymphatic structures in the adult human ON using a combination of four lymphatic markers. Cross and longitudinal cryo-sections of human optic nerve tissue (n = 12, male and female, postmortem time = 15.8 +/- 5.5 h, age = 66.5 +/- 13.8 years), were obtained from cornea donors of the Salzburg eye bank, and analyzed using immunofluorescence with the following markers: FOXC2, CCL21, LYVE-1 and podoplanin (PDPN; lymphatic markers), Iba1 (microglia), CD68 (macrophages), CD31 (endothelial cell, EC), NF200 (neurofilament), as well as GFAP (astrocytes). Human skin sections served as positive controls and confocal microscopy in single optical section mode was used for documentation. In human skin, lymphatic structures were detected, showing a co-localization of LYVE-1/PDPN/FOXC2 and CCL21/LYVE-1. In the human ON however, single LYVE-1 + cells were detected, but were not co-localized with any other lymphatic marker tested. Instead, LYVE-1 + cells displayed immunopositivity for Ibal and CD68, being more pronounced in the periphery of the ON than in the central region. However, Iba1 + /LYVE-1- cells outnumbered Iba1 + /LYVE-1 + cells. PDPN, revealed faint labeling in human ON tissue despite strong immunoreactivity in rat ON controls, showing co-localization with GFAP in the periphery. In addition, pronounced autofluorescent dots were detected in the ON, showing inter-individual differences in numbers. In the adult human ON no lymphatic structures were detected, although distinct lymphatic structures were identified in human skin tissue by co-localization of four lymphatic markers. However, single LYVE-1 + cells, also positive for Iba1 and CD68 were present, indicating LYVE-1 + macrophages. Inter-individual differences in the number of LYVE-1 + as well as Iba1 + cells were obvious within the ONs, most likely resulting from diverse medical histories of the donors.

The physiological processes that drive the development of ovarian follicle, as well as the process of oogenesis, are quite well known. Granulosa cells are major players in this occurrence, being the somatic element of the female gamete development. They participate directly in the processes of oogenesis, building the cumulus-oocyte complex surrounding the ovum. In addition to that, they have a further impact on the reproductive processes, being a place of steroid sex hormone synthesis and secretion. It is known that the follicle development creates a major need for angiogenesis and blood vessel development in the ovary. In this study, we use novel molecular approaches to analyze markers of these processes in porcine granulosa cultured primarily in vitro. The cells were recovered from mature sus scrofa specimen after slaughter. They were then subjected to enzymatic digestion and culture primarily for a short term. The RNA was extracted from cultures in specific time periods (0h, 24h, 48h, 96h, and 144h) and analyzed using expression microarrays. The genes that exhibited fold change bigger than |2|, and adjusted p-value lower than 0.05, were considered differentially expressed. From these, we have chosen the members of angiogenesis, blood vessel development, blood vessel morphogenesis, cardiovascular system development, and vasculature development for further selection. CCL2, FGFR2, SFRP2, PDPN, DCN, CAV1, CHI3L1, ITGB3, FN1, and LOX which are upregulated, as well as CXCL10, NEBL, IHH, TGFBR3, SCUBE1, IGF1, EDNRA, RHOB, PPARD, and SLITRK5 genes whose expression is downregulated through the time of culture, were chosen as the potential markers, as their expression varied the most during the time of culture. The fold changes were further validated with RT-qPCR. The genes were described, with special attention to their possible function in GCs during culture. The results broaden the general knowledge about GC's in vitro molecular processes and might serve as a point of reference for further in vivo and clinical studies.