The effect of coronavirus infection (SARS-CoV-2, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV) during pregnancy and the possibility of vertical maternal-fetal transmission: a systematic review and meta-analysis
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH
Authors: Diriba, Kuma; Awulachew, Ephrem; Getu, Eyob
Abstract
Background Coronavirus is challenging the global health care system from time to time. The pregnant state, with alterations in hormone levels and decreased lung volumes due to a gravid uterus and slightly immunocompromised state may predispose patients to a more rapidly deteriorating clinical course and can get a greater risk of harm for both the mother and fetus. Therefore, this systematic review was aimed to assess the effect of coronavirus infection (SARS-CoV-2, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV) during pregnancy and its possibility of vertical maternal-fetal transmission. Methods A systematic search was conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Google Scholar and the Cochrane Library until the end of April. All authors independently extracted all necessary data using excel spreadsheet form. Only published articles with fully accessible data on pregnant women infected with SARS-CoV, MARS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2 were included. Data on clinical manifestations, maternal and perinatal outcomes were extracted and analyzed. Result Out of 879 articles reviewed, 39 studies involving 1316 pregnant women were included. The most common clinical features were fever, cough, and myalgia with prevalence ranging from 30 to 97%, while lymphocytopenia and C-reactive protein were the most common abnormal laboratory findings (55-100%). Pneumonia was the most diagnosed clinical symptom of COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 infection with prevalence ranged from 71 to 89%. Bilateral pneumonia (57.9%) and ground-glass opacity (65.8%) were the most common CT imaging reported. The most common treatment options used were hydroxychloroquine (79.7%), ribavirin (65.2%), and oxygen therapy (78.8%). Regarding maternal outcome, the rate of preterm birth < 37 weeks of gestation was 14.3%, preeclampsia (5.9%), miscarriage (14.5%, preterm premature rupture of membranes (9.2%) and fetal growth restriction (2.8%). From the total coronavirus infected pregnant women, 56.9% delivered by cesarean, 31.3% admitted to ICU, while 2.7% were died. Among the perinatal outcomes, fetal distress rated (26.5%), neonatal asphyxia rated (1.4%). Only, 1.2% of neonates had apgar score < 7 at 5 min. Neonate admitted to ICU was rated 11.3%, while the rate of perinatal death was 2.2%. In the current review, none of the studies reported transmission of CoV from the mother to the fetus in utero during the study period. Conclusion Coronavirus infection is more likely to affect pregnant women. Respiratory infectious diseases have demonstrated an increased risk of adverse maternal obstetrical complications than the general population due to physiological changes occurred during pregnancy. None of the studies reported transmission of CoV from the mother to the fetus in utero, which may be due to a very low expression of angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 in early maternal-fetal interface cells.
SD1000: High Sustained Viral Response Rate in 1361 Patients With Hepatitis C Genotypes 1, 2, 3, and 4 Using a Low-cost, Fixed-dose Combination Tablet of Generic Sofosbuvir and Daclatasvir: A Multicenter, Phase III Clinical Trial
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Authors: Merat, Shahin; Sharifi, Amir-Houshang; Poustchi, Hossein; Hajiani, Eskandar; Gharavi, Abdolsamad; Karimi, Jalal; Mansour-Ghanaei, Fariborz; Fattahi, Mohammad-Reza; Ahmadi, Lida; Somi, Mohammad-Hossein; Kalantari, Hamid; Ghadir, Mohammad-Reza; Sheikhesmaeili, Farshad; Baniasadi, Nadieh; Sohrabi, Masoudreza; Moosavy, Seyedhamid; Ziaee, Masood; Zahedi, Mohammad-Javad; Mokhtare, Marjan; Sali, Shahnaz; Sayad, Babak; Afshar, Behrooz; Bakhshipour, Alireza; Parsi, Abazar; Sharifian, Afsaneh; Amiriani, Taghi; Malekzadeh, Zeinab; Merat, Dorsa; Ganji, Azita; Rahmani-Samani, Fereidoun; Jamali, Raika; Sofian, Masoomeh; Ghezlou, Mohammad; Sohrabpour, Amir Ali; Goshayeshi, Ladan; Valizadeh-Toosi, Seyed-Mohammad; Eslami, Layli; Maleki, Iradj; Hormati, Ahmad; Shayesteh, Ali-Akbar; Shayesteh, Elahe; Norouzi, Alireza; Abna, Zahra; Janbakhsh, Alireza; Fakheri, Hafez; Minakari, Mohammad; Sardarian, Hossein; Ghajary, Adel Fallah; Fattahi-Abdizadeh, Mojtaba; Latifnia, Maryam; Roozbeh, Fatemeh; Agah, Shahram; Fakhrieh-Asl, Saba; Nateghi-Baygi, Alireza; Fattahi, Babak; Nateghi-Baygi, Helia; Hill, Andrew; Malekzadeh, Reza
Abstract
Background. The combination of sofosbuvir and daclatasvir is a potent, pangenotypic regimen suitable for mass-scale hepatitis C treatment, especially in resource-limited countries where newer, expensive combinations are not available. This combination has been widely tested on genotype 4. However, Phase III trials of this combination in other genotypes have been cost prohibitive. With the introduction of generic, low-cost sofosbuvir and daclatasvir, large-scale studies in resource-limited countries are now possible. Methods. Sofosbuvir at 400 mg and daclatasvir at 60 mg were coformulated into a fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablet (Sovodak, Rojan Pharma, Tehran, Iran). Patients from 46 centers were dosed for 12 or 24 weeks with or without ribavirin, in line with existing guidelines. Responses to treatment were evaluated 12 weeks after the end of treatment (for a sustained virological response at Week 12; SVR12). Results. There were 1361 patients recruited. Overall, the patients were 21% female, with a mean age of 50 years; 39% were cirrhotic; 22% were treatment-experienced; 47% were genotype 1, 41% were genotype 3, and 2% were other genotypes. The genotype was not known in 10% of the patients. The intention-to-treat and per-protocol SVR12 rates were 94.7% and 98.8%, respectively. The safety profile was unremarkable, treatment was well tolerated, and compliance with the single-tablet regimen was excellent. Conclusions. The treatment with FDC of sofosbuvir and daclatasvir achieved high SVR12 rates, equivalent to those seen in Phase III trials of other pangenotypic options, and has been conducted at a similar scale in a representative, real-world population at a cost of under $100 per patient, which makes this combination suitable for elimination protocols in resource-limited countries.