Performance Characteristics
Comparative Study:
A comparative study was performed to demonstrate the equivalence of the CD Mycoplasma IgG ELISA test system to a Crowntitre IgG IFA test system.
The performance of the CD Mycoplasma IgG ELISA test system was evaluated in a two site clinical investigation. There were a total of 194 specimens tested; 109 at site one, and 85 at site two. Most of the specimens (192/194) were obtained from a reference laboratory in Northeastern United States. These specimens were sent to the lab for routine Mycoplasma serological analysis. The remaining two specimens were repository specimens which had been previously tested for Mycoplasma IgG antibody, and were found to be positive. All specimens were frozen and maintained according to the guidelines indicated under the Specimen Collection section of this insert.
Specimens were tested on the ELISA test system at the clinical sites, and were then tested in-house by IFA. Table 1 below shows the results of this comparative study. These results represent those from single patient samples and not from multiple draws from the same patient.
Table 1: Calculation of Relative Sensitivity, Specificity, and Agreement
Relative Sensitivity = 69/73 = 94.5% (95% Confidence Interval* = 89.3 to 99.7%)
Relative Specificity = 84/96 = 87.5% (95% Confidence Interval* = 80.9 to 94.1%)
Relative Agreement = 153/169 = 90.5% (95% Confidence Interval* = 86.1 to 94.9%)
* 95% confidence intervals calculated using the exact method.
In addition to the two-site clinical study described above, the Mycoplasma IgG ELISA was used to evaluate 35 pairs of acute and convalescent specimens which were previously characterized by complement fixation (CF). Of the 35 pairs, 29 pairs demonstrated a four-fold or greater increase in the CF endpoint titer. Of the 29 pairs, 16 pairs were ELISA negative at the acute stage, and positive at the convalescent stage; eight pairs were positive at both the acute and convalescent stage; and five pairs were negative at both the acute and convalescent stage.
NOTE: Be advised that relative refers to the comparison of this assay's results to that of a similar assay. There was not an attempt to correlate the assay's results with disease presence or absence. No judgment can be made on the comparison assay's accuracy to predict disease.