The Relationship Between Plasma DPP4 Activity to BDNF Ratio and Mild Cognitive Impairment in Elderly Population With Normal Glucose Tolerance
FRONTIERS IN AGING NEUROSCIENCE
Authors: Xiao, Liuping; Ge, Bo; Chen, Xu; Chen, Bo; Qin, Linyuan; Hu, Xueping; Pan, Haidong; Chen, Yujie; Tian, Li; Gao, Yun; Zheng, Tianpeng
Abstract
Objective: Since decreased brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and increased dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) activity have both been implicated in the pathogenesis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), the aim of our study was to evaluate the association of MCI with plasma DPP4 activity to BDNF ratio (DBR) in an elderly population with normal glucose tolerance. Methods: We cross-sectionally measured C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, nitrotyrosine, 8-iso-PGF2a, DPP4 activity BDNF and calculated the DBR in a total of 1,066 elderly participants in China. MCI was determined by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and finally confirmed by neurologists. Results: An inverse correlation was found between DPP4 activity and BDNF (r = -0.456, P < 0.001) and this inverse correlation was partly mediated by nitrotyrosine and 8-iso-PGF2a. Across rising quartiles of DBR, nitrotyrosine, 8-iso-PGF2a, C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 progressively increased, whereas the Montreal Cognitive Assessment score progressively decreased. Subjects in the lowest quartile of BDNF and highest quartiles of DBR and DPP4 activity, had higher MCI risk compared with subjects in the highest quartile of the BDNF and lowest quartiles of DBR and DPP4 activity, respectively (all P < 0.05). The odds ratio for MCI became more pronounced with decreased BDNF and increased DPP4. Conclusion: In conclusion, a negative correlation was found between DPP4 activity and BDNF, and this negative correlation was partly mediated by oxidative stress, not inflammation. The DBR was positively associated with MCI and thus may be used as a novel risk biomarker for MCI in an elderly population with normal glucose tolerance.
Physicians' choices in the first- and second-line management of type 2 diabetes in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
SAUDI PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL
Authors: Al-Rubeaan, Khalid; Bana, Faisal A.; Alruwaily, Fayez G.; Sheshah, Eman; Alnaqeb, Dhekra; AlQahtani, Awad M.; Ewais, Diaa; Al Juhani, Nassr; Hassan, Abdul-hameed; Youssef, Amira M.
Abstract
Objectives: The DISCOVER study is a global, prospective, three- year- observational (non-interventional) study that was conducted in 37 countries throughout the world including Saudi Arabia and aimed to assess variations in treatment patterns and therapeutic outcomes in type 2 diabetic patients. The current manuscript is reporting data of DISCOVER study across different health sectors of various provinces in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Methods: In this study, 519 Saudi type 2 diabetics, non-insulin users, aged 18 years or older, initiating second line therapy, were selected from nine health institutes, in four out of five provinces in Saudi Arabia. Data was collected at baseline (initiation of 2nd line therapy) by the treating physician using an electronic case report form (eCRF) via a web-based data capture system. Each selected subject was asked to complete four self-administered questionnaires. Results: The mean age of the studied population was 52.4 +/- 11 years. Among the subjects selected from the nine medical centers, 55% were men, with almost 65% between the ages of 46 and 65 years. The oral agent used as 1st line in the majority of patients was metformin, prescribed in 89.2% of the study cohort. In the second line, sitagliptin was the most frequently used, at 61.8%. followed by gliclazide, gliben-clamide, and glimepiride at 35.6%, 13.1%, and 12.7%, respectively. Conclusion: Metformin, with or without sulfonylureas, is the most commonly prescribed first-line treatment for patients with type 2 diabetes, managed either in governmental institutions, or in the private sector. The most common second line drugs were DPP4 inhibitors, mainly sitagliptin, followed by the third and second generation of sulfonylureas. Drug affordability was not an issue, since the vast majority of the patients received medication free of charge. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University.