Anti-Human CD14 monoclonal antibody

Both preclinical and clinical evidence supports the involvement of the endocannabinoid system in the pathobiology of cerebral ischemia. Selective cannabinoid-2 (CB2) receptor agonists exert significant neuroprotection in animal models of focal brain ischemia through a robust anti-inflammatory effect, involving both resident and peripheral immune cells. Nevertheless, no definitive studies demonstrating the relevance of CB2 receptors in human stroke exist. Using rtPCR and flow cytometry assays, we investigated CB2 receptor expression in circulating monocytes from 26 acute ischemic stroke patients and 16 age-matched healthy controls (CT). We also evaluated miR-665 expression, as potential CB2 receptor regulator. The median mRNA levels of CB2 were significantly (p < 0.0001) increased in total monocytes 24 h and 48 h after stroke as compared with CT. This was paralleled by elevation of miR-665 levels in monocytes collected from patients 24 h (p < 0.05 vs CT) and 48 h (p < 0.05 vs CT andp < 0.0001 vs 24 h) after ischemic stroke. Furthermore, an increased percentage of CB2+/CD16+ events, but not CB2+/CD14+ events, was found 24 h [20.17% (IQR, 17.22-23.58)] and 48 h [18.61% (IQR, 15.44-22.06)] after ischemic stroke when compared with CT [10.96% (IQR, 9.185-13.32)]. The percentage of CB2+/CD16+ events in monocytes was positively correlated with NIHSS score at entrance (r = 0.4327,p = 0.027). The potential beneficial functions of CD16+ intermediate and nonclassical monocytes in stroke and the elevated expression of CB2 receptor in these subsets strongly suggest that CB2 receptor agonists can be exploited for the treatment of ischemic stroke patients.

Background: Regular use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) is associated with lower risk of colorectal cancer. Genome-wide interaction analysis on single variants (G x E) has identified several SNPs that may interact with NSAIDs to confer colorectal cancer risk, but variations in gene expression levels may also modify the effect of NSAID use. Therefore, we tested interactions between NSAID use and predicted gene expression levels in relation to colorectal cancer risk. Methods: Genetically predicted gene expressions were tested for interaction with NSAID use on colorectal cancer risk among 19,258 colorectal cancer cases and 18,597 controls from 21 observational studies. A Mixed Score Test for Interactions (MiSTi) approach was used to jointly assess G x E effects which are modeled via fixed interaction effects of the weighted burden within each gene set (burden) and residual G x E effects (variance). A false discovery rate (FDR) at 0.2 was applied to correct for multiple testing. Results: Among the 4,840 genes tested, genetically predicted expression levels of four genes modified the effect of any NSAID use on colorectal cancer risk, including DPP10 (P-GxE = 1.96 x 10(-4)), KRT16 (P-GxE = 2.3 x 10(-4)), CD14 (P-GxE = 9.38 x 10(-4)), and CYP27A1 (P-GxE = 1.44 x 10(-3)). There was a significant interaction between expression level of RP11-89N17 and regular use of aspirin only on colorectal cancer risk (P-GxE = 3.23 x 10(-5)). No interactions were observed between predicted gene expression and nonaspirin NSAID use at FDR < 0.2. Conclusions: By incorporating functional information, we discovered several novel genes that interacted with NSAID use. Impact: These findings provide preliminary support that could help understand the chemopreventive mechanisms of NSAIDs on colorectal cancer.