A Retrospective Study from 2 Centers in China on the Effects of Continued Use of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers in Patients with Hypertension and COVID-19
MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR
Authors: Wang, Zhongchao; Zhang, Dewei; Wang, Shengming; Jin, Yanhua; Huan, Jianbo; Wu, Yue; Xia, Cheng; Li, Zhe; Qi, Xingshun; Zhang, Duanzhen; Han, Xiumin; Zhu, Xianyang; Qu, Ying; Wang, Qiguang
Abstract
Background: Use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients lacks evidence and is still controversial. This study was designed to investigate effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) on clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients and to assess the safety of ACEIs/ARBs medication. Material/Methods: COVID-19 patients with hypertension from 2 hospitals in Wuhan, China, from 17 Feb to 18 Mar 2020 were retrospectively screened and grouped according to in-hospital medication. We performed 1: 1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis to adjust for confounding factors. Results: We included 210 patients and allocated them to ACEIs/ARBs (n=81; 46.91% males) or non-ACEIs/ARBs (n=129; 48.06% males) groups. The median age was 68 [interquartile range (IQR) 615-76] and 66 (IQR 59-72.5) years, respectively. General comparison showed mortality in the ACEIs/ARBs group was higher (8.64% vs. 3.88%) but the difference was not significant (P=0.148). ACEIs/ARBs was associated with significantly more cases 7-categorical ordinal scale >2 at discharge, more cases requiring Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay, and increased values and ratio of days that blood pressure (BP) was above normal range (P<0.05). PSM analysis showed no significant difference in mortality, cumulative survival rate, or other clinical outcomes such as length of in-hospital/ICU stay, BP fluctuations, or ratio of adverse events between groups after adjustment for confounding parameters on admission. Conclusions: We found no association between ACEIs/ARBs and clinical outcomes or adverse events, thus indicating no evidence for discontinuing use of ACEIs/ARBs in the COVID-19 pandemic.
Development and Validation of Criteria for Sparing Confirmatory Tests in Diagnosing Primary Aldosteronism
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Authors: Wang, Kanran; Hu, Jinbo; Yang, Jun; Song, Ying; Fuller, Peter J.; Hashimura, Hikaru; He, Wenwen; Feng, Zhengping; Cheng, Qingfeng; Du, Zhipeng; Wang, Zhihong; Ma, Linqiang; Yang, Shumin; Li, Qifu
Abstract
Context: The Endocrine Society Guidelines for the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism (PA) suggest that confirmatory tests (CFT) are not required when the following criteria are met: plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) is >20 ng/dL, plasma renin is below detection levels, and hypokalemia is present. The evidence for the applicability of the guideline criteria is limited. Objective: To develop and validate optimized criteria for sparing CFT in the diagnosis of PA. Design and Setting: The optimized criteria were developed in a Chinese cohort using the captopril challenge test, verified by saline infusion test (SIT) and fludrocortisone suppression test (FST), and validated in an Australian cohort. Participants: Hypertensive patients who completed PA screening and CFT. Main Outcome Measure: Diagnostic value of the optimized criteria. Results: In the development cohort (518 PA and 266 non-PA), hypokalemia, PAC, and plasma renin concentration (PRC) were selected as diagnostic indicators by multivariate logistic analyses. The combination of PAC >20 ng/dL plus PRC <2.5 mu IU/mL plus hypokalemia had much higher sensitivity than the guideline criteria (0.36 vs 0.11). The optimized criteria remained superior when the SIT or FST were used as CFT. Non-PA patients were not misdiagnosed by either criteria, but the percentage of patients in whom CFT could be spared was higher with the optimized criteria. In the validation cohort (125 PA and 81 non-PA), the sensitivity of the optimized criteria was also significantly higher (0.12 vs 0.02). Conclusions: Hypertensive patients with PAC >20 ng/dL, PRC <2.5 mu IU/mL, plus hypokalemia can be confidently diagnosed with PA without confirmatory tests.